Cognitive dissonance is the mental conflict that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by new information. The unease or tension that the conflict provokes in people is comforted by one of several defensive maneuvers: they reject, explain away, or avoid the new information; convince themselves that no conflict really exists; reconcile the differences; or resort to any other defensive means of preserving stability or order in their conceptions of the world and of themselves. The Hunters Become the Hunted series has caused significant cognitive dissonance with some viewers. Some try to explain certain issues away, others choose to completely ignore, and yet another group rejects it so viciously that they are even willing to hurt the project by accusing the people affiliated with it with being far-right extremists, conspiracy nutcases and even Nazi’s. Some find it necessary to spread lies about the people affiliated with the project. That is unfortunate but was to be expected. According to the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, all truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. This project was not just created to debunk the allegations against Michael Jackson, although we have published many videos doing just that and will publish more when we deem it necessary. But Michael Jackson will never be fully vindicated if the public remains unaware of the deeper lying plot against him. Something Michael himself has talked about in the past and has tried to expose through the lyrics, symbolism, and imagery in his work. By sharing Michael’s own work and spreading the message he tried to put out over the years, we strive to give both the fans and the general public a better understanding of Michael Jackson the man, and not just the artist. While this new series will be a lot to take in for those unaware of the information and may seem completely ridiculous to a few, we do hope you will absorb the material, watch again if needed and, most importantly, do your own independent investigation into the matters discussed. Our objective is not to convince anyone. What we hope to achieve, mainly with this series, is to open people’s eyes and to expose the motivation behind the wickedness in this world that is still trying to destroy Michael Jackson to this day. Unfortunately, that means that we must present the viewer with challenging theories and realities. The theories in this series are influenced by research into Michael’s life which spans over a decade and therefore the views expressed are inevitably biased. While we do not claim that we hold the absolute truth, we aim to validate this research with facts and with Michael’s own work by looking into the symbolism he has used throughout his life and the words that came out of his mouth. Michael’s lyrics and short films have never failed to make fans - and critics alike - wonder what he really meant or tried to illustrate. Numerous articles and blogs, as well as entire websites have been dedicated to try and unravel the mysteries behind his work where ideas and theories have gone in many different directions. What is Billie Jean really about? Who are Annie, Diana, and Susie? What did he mean with the system that is in control and what book is it then run by? What is the story behind Moonwalker and what is going on the Dangerous album cover? And why was Michael in trouble in the past and accused of being an anti-Semite? We will not be able to reveal all the mysteries of all songs and videos, only Michael himself would be able to do that. But after years and years of research, the path we will lay out in this series connects with his work and words throughout his life. What we will try to show is the man behind the public persona, the depth of his lyrics and his videos and the message he tried so hard to deliver. If you rather believe Michael’s lyrics and videos were merely about groupies and ex-girlfriends, this series might not be your cup of tea. If you see Michael as a person who is intelligent and well-read and who might very well have put messages in his work which upset a certain group of powerful people to a point where they deemed it necessary to destroy him, please stay put. What we consider to be the truth behind the evil scheme against Michael Jackson and behind his own lyrics and symbolism is something so evil, so heart-breaking and horrifying, that many viewers will discard it at first. We know because we have been there as well. Waking up to the iniquity in this world takes time and commitment and requires a deep-rooted determination to find the truth and expose evil. We hope that the majority of our viewers will take this information serious enough to at least consider the possibility, despite the distress and in some cases even anguish this series may cause. Before we can get into the symbolism behind Michael’s work we need to provide you with some necessary factual, biblical, and historical background, as irrelevant as it may seem to some. This series will consist of seven parts and only the seventh part will go specifically into Michael’s work, but the first six are of essence to understand the seventh, so please bear with us. This first part is named after Michael’s song ‘Money’, because we will literally follow the money, and by that we mean all money. It is a translation of a video made by a Dutch video maker who went viral in The Netherlands because of his excellent presentation of our current situation. We are using his work, edited slightly for the purpose of this video, with the maker’s explicit permission. By now you may have a feeling that something is not right with our current situation. Many ill-founded conspiracy theories may have caused you to distance yourself from both the media’s fearmongering, and those who spread conspiracy theories. Still, we hope you will listen to us. As you watch this film, millions of people worldwide are falling into poverty because of measures that have been in place for almost a year. While you may not have been impacted yet, it is only a matter of time before the greatest economic crisis of our time will have a ripple effect on your whole community. This is not fearmongering but a harsh reality. We believe that we can limit the damage and even benefit from it if we are correctly and objectively informed about our situation. Therefore, we would like to present essential information, based on easily verifiable facts. Less than a handful of mega-corporations dominate every aspect of our lives. This may sound like an exaggeration, but everything from the breakfast we eat in the morning to the mattress we sleep on at night and everything we wear, do, or consume in between is mainly dependent on these corporations. These are investment corporations of immense proportions that control the world's major financial flows. They are the protagonists of the movie we are currently watching. To not take up too much of your time, we have summarized the most crucial information as briefly as possible. How does it work? PepsiCo, for example, is the parent company of many best-selling soft drinks and snacks worldwide. There are many different competing brands. Still, they all come from factories of only several corporations, which together have a monopoly on the industry. Within the packaged food industry there are several large companies such as Unilever, the Coca-Cola Company, Mondelez, and Nestle. This picture shows how almost every known brand in the packaged food industry belongs to one of these corporations. You can easily verify this information on the websites of the respective brands or Wikipedia. Companies of this magnitude are usually publicly traded and have a board of directors where the largest shareholders call the shots. From sources such as Yahoo Finance, we can see detailed company information, including their largest shareholders. Upon examining PepsiCo’s shareholders, we can observe that no less than 3,155 institutional investors hold 72.82 percent of the shares. This includes investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and in some cases, governments. Let’s take a look at who the biggest investors of PepsiCo are. As you can see, 10 of these 3,155 investors account for nearly a third of all shares. The combined share capital of this top 10 has a value of roughly $59 billion. But 3 out of the 10 investors own more shares than the other seven combined. Remember their names as we delve into who owns the most shares of Pepsi's main competitor; The Coca-Cola Company. As with PepsiCo, most of the shares are held by institutional investors. We will analyze the top 10, starting with the bottom six. Four of the six institutional investors are also present in the bottom six of PesiCo’s top 10 investors; Northern Trust, JP Morgan Chase, Geode Capital Management, and Wellington Management specifically. Of the four largest shareholders, three of them were also in the top four of PepsiCo; Blackrock, Vanguard, Berkshire Hathaway, and State Street. These four corporations are the largest investment companies in the world. While PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company are anything but competitors, other large companies that own multiple brands, such as Unilever, Mondelez, and Nestle, also belong to the same small group of institutional investors. And it is not only in the packaged food industry that you will find these names. For example, with a simple search on Wikipedia of the largest technology companies, it can be discovered that Facebook owns WhatsApp and Instagram, among other platforms. Together with Twitter they form the most popular social media platforms in the world. Alphabet is the parent company of all Google businesses including YouTube and Gmail. But they are also the biggest sponsors and developers of Android and Apple iOS, two operating systems on which nearly all smartphones and tablets in the world function. Combined with Microsoft, these four companies produce the software that almost every computer, tablet, and smartphone in the world depend on. Let’s analyze who possesses the most shares of these powerful companies. When examining Facebook, 80 per cent of its shares are held by the same institutional investors that hold shares in PepsiCo, and Coca-Cola. Twitter is also in hands of these investors. Once Again, the same financers are pulling the strings. They also hold stocks in Apple and its biggest competitor Microsoft. In all the companies that dominate the technology industry that develop and build our computers, T.V.s, smartphones, and home appliances, this same circle of financers owns most of their shares. This can be observed in every industry in the world. To further illustrate, let’s say you want to plan a holiday. You use your computer or smartphone to search for a cheap flight to the sun via Skyscanner or Expedia. You will fly with one of the many airlines, like in Air France-KLM. The aircraft you will fly on is most likely a Boeing or an Airbus. Then you will proceed to look for a hotel or apartment through Booking.com or Airbnb. Once you arrive at your destination, you will go out for dinner and write a review on Tripadvisor. The same investors are behind every single aspect of your journey. Their power reaches further still, for even the kerosine the planes burn for fuel comes from one of their oil companies and refineries and even the steel the aircraft is built from is sourced from one of their many mining companies. This small club of investment companies, banks, and investment funds is the largest shareholder in the primary industries from which our raw materials come. The same holds true for the world's largest agricultural companies on which our entire food industry depends. They own, among others, Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, which is the world's largest seed producer that produces 90% of the world's cottonseed. These investors own shares in the world's largest textile producers and the popular clothing brands that process cotton into the clothes we wear. They own the tobacco companies that produce all the world's popular tobacco brands, but also own all the companies in the pharmaceutical industry and the scientific institutes that produce the medicines to treat lung cancer. They own the companies that produce our metals and raw materials for our vehicle, aircraft, and weapons industries, where a large portion of those metals and raw materials are processed. They own the companies that build our electronics. They own the department stores and online marketplaces, and the means of payment we use to pay for their products. To keep this as short as possible, we have decided to show only the tip of the iceberg. If you choose to investigate yourself using the source’s you have just seen, you will discover that many of the most recognized insurance companies, banks, construction companies, telephone companies, restaurant chains, and cosmetic brands are owned by the same investors we have just discussed. What is most astonishing is that all these financers also own shares in each other’s companies, and together they form an immense network that can be compared to a pyramid. The smaller investors are owned by more prominent investors who, in turn, are held by even larger investors. The pyramid's visible top consists of only two companies, and we have seen their names many times; Vanguard and Blackrock. The power of these two companies is something we can hardly imagine. Not only are they themselves among the largest shareholders in almost every major company on the planet, but they also own the other stakeholders in those companies, giving them a monopoly. According to a report by Bloomberg, which is one of the world's most respected institutions for financial data and analysis, experts say that by 2028 both companies will collectively manage some 20 trillion dollars in investments, owning almost everything on earth. Bloomberg also calls Blackrock the government's fourth arm because it is the only non-government body to work closely with federal banks, also known as central banks. Blackrock lends money to the federal bank and is a primary advisor and developer of the federal banks' computer system. Dozens of Blackrock employees held high positions in the White House during the Bush and Obama administrations. CEO Larry Fink is a welcome guest of many heads of state and politicians, which is understandable - he is the face of the company that is pulling the strings. Yet Larry Fink does not pull strings himself. Shareholders own Blackrock. If we look at who those shareholders are, we come to a curious conclusion. Blackrock's largest shareholder is none other than Vanguard. And this is where it gets dark, for Vanguard itself is a private company where we cannot see who its shareholders are. The elites who own Vanguard apparently do not want it known that they are the owners of the most powerful company on earth. But of course, this is no secret to those willing to investigate it. According to reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg, one per cent of the world's population collectively owns more money than the other 99 per cent. In fact, Oxfam claims that a whopping 82% of all money earned in 2017 was distributed to this 1%. It goes without saying that those who own the most powerful company on earth are among the very richest within the 1%, more precisely 0.001%, or one thousandth of a percent. Forbes magazine claims that in March 2020 there were some 2,095 billionaires and Oxfam's report shows that two-thirds of all these billionaires obtained their capital through inheritances and monopolies. This means that the wealthiest families on earth own Vanguard. If we study their history, we discover that these families have always been at the top of the pyramid. Some even long before the industrial revolution began. Because their history is so extensive, this will be discussed in a later video in the series, but in order not to stray too far off topic, we will stick with the fact that these families, many of whom belong to royal bloodlines, are the founders of our banking system and every industry in the world. These families have never lost their power, even though an ever-increasing world population has forced them to hide behind investment companies such as Vanguard, whose largest shareholders are the private funds and non-profit organizations of these families. To make the big picture more understandable, we must briefly explain this type of non-profit organization. It turns out that they are also the link that connects business with politics and the media, so the conflict of interest is not apparent at first sight. Nonprofits, also called foundations, are organizations that depend on donations and do not have to publish from whom they receive these donations. They can invest this money in whatever they want and, in principle, do not have to pay any profit tax. Nonprofits can pump hundreds of billions of dollars from invisible investors. According to a report by the Australian government, this makes nonprofit organizations the ideal way to finance terrorist groups and launder large sums of money. The foundations and funds of families high up in the 1% hierarchy are kept in the background as much as possible. However, for situations that receive a lot of publicity and attention, the foundations of philanthropic families that are lower in the hierarchy, but also extremely rich, are used. The three most important foundations that connect all industries in the world are: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation of the controversial multibillionaire George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation. According to the World Economic Forum's official website, the Gates Foundation is the largest funder of the World Health Organization after Donald Trump stopped US funding to the WHO. in 2020. This makes the Gates Foundation one of the most influential organizations globally regarding every aspect of our healthcare. The Gates Foundation has a close working relationship with the 16 largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Biontech, and Bayer. And we already know who owns the most shares in these companies. Bill Gates was anything but a poor computer geek who made it to one of the world's richest people but came from a family of philanthropists who, like him, worked for the absolute elite. He is the founder of Microsoft which, as we know, is owned by Blackrock, Vanguard, and Berkshire Hathaway. Simultaneously, the Gates Foundation is the biggest shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway, where he was even a board member for a time. We could spend hours analyzing everything the Gates Foundation, George Soros' Open Society Foundation and the Clinton Foundation are involved in. But as they form an essential bridge to the next topic and current affairs, this short introduction was critical. The following topic should start with a question. An average person with a phone, computer or a laptop can objectively depict in about 20 minutes that only two companies have a total monopoly over all the world's industries. The question, then, is why don't you hear about this in the media? We can choose from countless reports, documentaries, and television programs every day. Yet not one of them is covering this issue. Is it not interesting enough, or are there other interests at stake? According to Wikipedia, approximately 90% of the international media is in the hands of nine media conglomerates. Whether it is the streaming monopolists Netflix and Amazon Prime, or mega corporations that have many subsidiaries such as Time Warner, The Walt Disney Company, Comcast, Fox Corporation, Bertelsmann, or Viacom CBS, we see that the same names own the shares. These corporations produce many different programs, movies, and documentaries and own the channels on which they are broadcast. Besides our industries, our entire information flow is in the hands of the same elite, and we want to demonstrate briefly how this works, taking the Netherlands as an example. The entire Dutch mainstream media is in the hands of three mega corporations. The first one is the Pers Groep, which is the parent company of the following brands. Besides many of the most well-known newspapers and magazines, they also own Sanoma Media Nederland, the parent company of broad casting companies SBS, Net 5 and Veronica. Many foreign media outlets, such as the Belgian VTM stations, also belong to De Pers Groep. The second is Mediahuis, one of Europe's largest media concerns which publishes some of the largest newspapers in Belgium and The Netherlands. On April 30th 2019 Mediahuis acquired Independent News & Media, which gave Mediahuis control over the Irish Independent and the Sunday Independent, respectively Ireland's top-selling daily and Sunday newspaper, among other assets. Finally, there’s Bertelsmann, one of the nine largest media conglomerates in the world. This company owns RTL, which owns 45 television and 32 radio stations in 11 countries, including all the Dutch RTL stations. Bertelsmann is the founder of BMG Music, bol.com and numerous other well-known companies and organizations. They also own the world's largest book publisher, Penguin Random House. In 2019, Bertelsmann had a turnover of EUR 18 billion. The shares of these three companies are held by the private funds of three affluent families in the 1% of extremely wealthy people; the Belgian Van Thillo family, the Belgian Leysen family, and the German Bertelsmann-Mohn family. According to Wikipedia, all three families have a well-known war record and collaborated with the Nazis. As a result, the Telegraaf, which belonged to the Leysen family, was banned in the Netherlands for years after the war. To complete the picture, let’s examine where the news that these media outlets feed us every day originates from. The various news media do not produce their own news but use information and images from press agencies such as ANP and Reuters. These organizations are anything but independent. For example, the ANP is owned by Dutch billionaire John de Mol's Talpa, and the powerful Canadian Thomson family owns Thomson Reuters. The most important journalists and editors who work for our media and news agencies are affiliated with important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center. They are one of the largest funders of media-related projects in all of Europe. They train journalists, produce study materials, give out internships at ANP, and work closely with the world's largest corporations such as Google and Facebook. For journalistic analysis and opinion, all major media in the world use Project Syndicate, the most powerful organization in its field. They supply the 500 most influential media outlets in 150 countries. Project Syndicate, and organizations such as the European Journalism Center, together with the news agencies, connect all the different media outlets globally. When news anchors read from their teleprompters, the chances are that the text originates from one of these organizations. As a result, the global media often seems to be synchronized in its reporting. In September 2020, the European journalism center, in cooperation with Facebook, launched a multi-million-dollar fund intended to support their selected news organizations during corona time. Let us examine who funds the organizations that work with the news agencies to produce our news. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation and the European center for journalism fund Project Syndicate. In turn, the European Journalism Center is funded by the Gates Foundation and the Open Society Foundation, and they also receive large donations from Facebook, Google, the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The organizations that form the basis of the Dutch information flow are financed by the non-profit organizations of the same elite that control the media, and it is no different in other countries, we encourage you to research this for your own country. That means that a portion of our tax money goes to these organizations. In Belgium, it regularly causes a stir that billionaire corporations such as Mediahuis and De Pers Groep receive hundreds of millions in subsidies from the Belgian government, while many of their media outlets are located abroad. To close this chapter on the media, let’s explore the Dutch public broadcasting corporation NPO, which uses the same news sources as the commercial media and receives about a billion euros a year in subsidies. The criticism that public broadcasting is a mouthpiece of the government, which consequently is an agent of the world's corporations, does not come out of the blue. - Tjibbe Joustra is the chairman of the NPO Supervisory Board. He wrote the election programme for the political party ‘VVD’. - Former VVD leader Ed Nijpels was the boss of the Dutch public broadcaster AVROTROS until 2019. - VVD alderman Erik van den Burg is chairman of NTR. - Former VVD party chairman Bas Eenhoorn is chairman of WNL. - PVDA member and former State Secretary Martijn van Dam is responsible for the distribution of subsidies to NPO and became a member of its Board of Directors. - Former PVDA party chairman Ruud Koole is on the supervisory board of VARA. - CDA politician Paul Rüpp is chairman of the supervisory board of KRO-NCRV. - The partner of D66 minister Ollongren, Irene van den Brekel, is chief editor of current affairs for the television show Lubach. - The former newsreader Pia Dijkstra is now a second member of parliament for D66. This was a lot of information to process about many people you probably have never heard of if you do not live in The Netherlands, but the same connections between media and politics can be found anywhere in the world, as we have previously mentioned in our series ‘The Hunters become The Hunted’. We have summarized it in as few words as possible and only used those examples that we found necessary to paint a clear picture, helping us better understand the current circumstances. It is a broad subject that can change our view of many historical events. We aim to inform you about the danger we are in now. There will be plenty of time to delve into the past, so let’s continue to dissect current events. The elite who controls every aspect of our lives depends on an unimaginably coordinated collaboration to connect all the different industries on earth and make them work for their benefit. The World Economic Forum, one of the world's most critical organizations, is one place where these collaborations take place. At its annual meeting in Davos, the CEOs of the world's largest companies meet with heads of state, politicians, and organizations such as Unicef and Greenpeace. The WEF Supervisory Board includes former Vice-President Al Gore, Dutch Minister Sigrid Kaag, Feike Sijbesma, the Chairman of Royal DSM and member of the Supervisory Board of the Dutch Bank, and Christine Lagarde, the President of the European Central Bank. The son of Ferd Grapperhaus, the Dutch Minister of Justice and Security, also works for the WEF. According to Wikipedia, membership to the organization costs around €35,000 a year. Still, more than half of the budget comes from its partners, who pay for the membership of politicians who cannot afford their own participation. According to critics, the WEF is a business forum where the richest companies can negotiate deals with other companies and politicians. The objective of the WEF for many of the participants is said to be personal gain instead of solving the world’s social problems. While not wanting to make assumptions, but would there be so many problems on earth at all if the most important industry leaders, bankers, and politicians had met every year since 1971 to solve our world problems? Is it not illogical that for 50 years the most important environmental organizations in the world have been meeting with the CEOs of the most heavily polluting corporations on earth, while our natural environment has been getting worse? It soon becomes clear that these critics are proven correct when we look at who the most important partners are, which account for more than half of the WEF budget; Blackrock, the Open Society Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other companies in which Vanguard and Blackrock directly or indirectly hold shares. Klaus Schwab, the chairman and founder of the WEF, is a Swiss professor, and businessman. In his book ‘The Great Reset’, he describes his organization's plans in detail. According to him, the coronavirus is the perfect opportunity to reset our society in every aspect. He calls this plan "Building Back Better" and this slogan seems to have become the motto of all globalist politicians worldwide. According to Schwab, our current civilization must be exchanged for a new one. Schwab contends that countries will surrender their sovereignty to an all-encompassing world government. People will own nothing but work for the state in exchange for their homes, health care, and all basic needs. According to the WEF, all this is necessary because our modern consumer society, which the elite have forced upon us, is no longer sustainable. In his book, Schwab rules out that we will ever return to the old normal, and the WEF recently published a video that wants to make it clear that in 2030, we will own nothing but be happy. You have probably heard of the New World Order. The media would have us believe that this is a conspiracy theory. However, generations of presidents such as George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, and Nelson Mandela have discussed this subject before. Apart from Mandela, these important figures were all among the elite when they were alive and are not the only ones who dream of an all-powerful world government. In 2015, the UN presented its controversial “Agenda 2030”, which is almost identical to Klaus Schwab's “The Great Reset.” In its own words, the UN wants to ensure that poverty, hunger, environmental pollution, and disease no longer exist on earth by 2030. It sounds like a sympathetic plan, until you read the fine print. The UN wants Agenda 2030 to be paid for by us, the citizens. Just as we are currently required to surrender our basic rights for the sake of public health, we will be required to give up our wealth for the sake of reducing poverty. This is not a conspiracy theory; you can read it for yourself on their official website. In summary, the UN wants to distribute the tax money from Western countries to the elite mega-corporations that will be contracted to recreate the entire society. The UN endeavors to make fossil fuels a thing of the past by 2030. Therefore, a new infrastructure is needed. For this massive project, the UN requires a one world government, and they are taking steps to make this a reality. Like Schwab, the UN believes that a pandemic is a perfect opportunity to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030. It is worrying that the WEF and the UN openly admit that they see pandemics and national disasters as an opportunity to remodel society, especially since we have seen that the elite have the means at their disposal to create the illusion that there is a pandemic. We should not be naïve. We should examine everything critically. When we do, we come across things that are even more worrying. On the 18th of October 2019, months before the pandemic was declared, a meeting was held at the Pierre Hotel in New York City for a select group of important guests, including the world's most respected doctors, pharmacists, and politicians. The purpose of the meeting was to simulate the possible scenarios in the event of a global pandemic. Now, you may be thinking this is simply a coincidence. However, a coronavirus was used as an example for the simulation. The simulation demonstrated in detail how the coronavirus would develop and how it could only be brought under control through the intensive cooperation of entire industries, governments, and government bodies, creating a new world order to save us from destruction. Does it come as a surprise when we tell you that this meeting, called Event 201, was organized by none other than the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the John Hopkins Institute? This is, again, not a conspiracy theory; you can see for yourself the official page of Event 201. Perhaps it is not surprising that the Robert Koch Institute, which like every national health institute in the world is intricately linked to the Gates-funded WHO, created a similar simulation in 2012. Much like Event 201, this simulation assumed a coronavirus. This simulation assumed that a coronavirus would spread from animal to human in a south-east Asian food market. What a coincidence, right? In this simulation, it takes several weeks for the Chinese authorities to discover the virus, allowing it to spread worldwide in the meantime. A simulation is made of the successive three years in which lockdowns follow; economies are destroyed, and the impact on society is simulated in all aspects, even the popular uprisings. We will not bore you with the details; you can download this analysis yourself on a German government website. Lastly, we want to show you an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Marc van Ranst gave on the 22nd of January 2019 at Chatham House, a non-profit organization in London where the most important people on earth meet to discuss the world's problems. Chatham House Prize winners include Hillary Clinton, Melinda Gates, and John Kerry. What is discussed during Van Ranst's lecture is simply shocking. Van Ranst explains how he fooled the Belgian population during the Mexican flu by spreading fear, taking mortality figures out of context and manipulating the media. He laughingly describes how he managed to force the vaccine for the Mexican flu, which was produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for at the time, on the frightened Belgian population. The Chatham House organization is financed by the Gates Foundation's big companies. We could talk for hours about Covid-19, and the incomprehensible measures that have destroyed our society, made millions of entrepreneurs breadless, left countless elderly people to die in solitary confinement in nursing homes, separated from their families, all for a virus that has 99.9% survival rate. Still, we think we have looked at enough facts that put the global covid measures into an understandable context, seen from the elite’s perspective. This wealthy elite collectively owns tens of thousands of billions. They have no problem whatsoever with more than 40% of the world's population living on less than five and a half dollars a day or millions of children dying from drinking water that has been purposefully polluted or because of malnutrition, or by their bullets and bombs. Al they desire is to become even richer. The elite have absolutely no intention of sharing their wealth with us. They are honest about their plans to take away every last thing that belongs to us. And those plans are being carried out as we speak. In another video in this series we will examine the elites motive in-depth because it requires us to delve into history and address issues beyond our modern rational thinking. Until then, perhaps the simple logic that a new world order or an all-encompassing world government is the only way for a small elite to maintain power over an ever-increasing world population will suffice. Corporations like Blackrock and Vanguard do not benefit from national borders, import taxes, and authentic diversity. They can only keep us in their grip through fear and manipulation. We will not discuss the inhuman blackmail methods by which the elite keep their own most essential pawns in line, but those who have watched our previous series will get the idea. And if this subject has piqued your interest enough to start your own research, you will undoubtedly find out soon enough. The elite have no intention of curing us of the countless illnesses we contract from the food they produce and the environmental pollution they cause. If we did not get sick, the entire pharmaceutical industry would collapse. "Nothing sells like fear" is the motto of top virologists such as Marc van Ranst. You will be amazed to discover that we have been warned countless times about this elite. With this video we hope to extend the olive branch to reduce the ever-widening distance between us. Only when we, the people are divided can the elite maintain their power over us. Their greatest fear is that we will realize what is really going on in the world, and the only way they intend to prevent this is through censorship, cutting off human contact, the constant framing of political opponents and dissenters and the use of brute force. The plans of the elite are clear and so is the brutal way in which they intend to realize them. If we allow them to do this, a new society would be built on the ashes of the old one. A new society in which we will own nothing, not even our own house. The elite wants to ensure that between now and 2030, everything you own now becomes theirs. This will require a devastating economic crisis. The first to be attacked is the middle class, the backbone of society. Entrepreneurs will be forced into sky-high debts that will ultimately cause them to lose their possessions. After that, things will move quickly. Banks will fall, cash will be banned, and the only way not to starve to death will be to accept government aid with conditions attached. The vaccination passport and the surrender of property being just one example. Because entrepreneurs are the first to fall and many others are not yet feeling the crisis directly in their pockets, it leaves the people divided until it is too late. This is not a doomsday scenario dreamt up by us. It is simply The Great Reset. The new world order has been in preparation for generations, tested extensively in every communist dictatorship in the world. But it doesn’t have to be that way. Instead of a great reset, together we can unleash a great awakening on earth and create a world where no one must go hungry. Where we can live sustainability in nature and live united in freedom. This is not idealistic daydreaming. There have always been opposing forces that have tried to break the power of the elite. Until recently, our means of communication have been insufficient to initiate a mass awakening. The elite have always wanted to keep us ignorant of the discoveries of geniuses such as Tesla, who was far advanced in the field of clean, free energy. Or Dr. Rife, who, like Tesla, used radio waves to cure at least 16 terminal cancer patients before he was killed under mysterious circumstances. Or Henry Ford, who in 1941 built a car from bioplastic that proved stronger than steel. The elite have denied us many such techniques because they threatened their monopolies in every industry. They were methods that gave us freedoms and endangered the power of the elite based on our fear and dependence on its products. These are not conspiracy theories but facts. A world of new possibilities is opening for all of us where there need not be poverty, pollution, disease, and war. And where governments work for the good of the people instead of the other way around. Countless ailments that now earn the pharmaceutical industry hundreds of billions of dollars will be cured. No one will have to work their butts off to live a dignified life. People will no longer live in fear because of the lies told by the media, the pharmaceutical industry, the climate lobby, and politicians. It is all in the offing, but we must bite the bullet and recognize our society's real problem. We want to thank you for listening and we hope that one day we will be able to remember this unique moment in history in our fight for freedom. It will be a difficult journey, but we will make it together. We will help each other rise when we fall. We will not be afraid. We are the 99%.
Unlock with Patreon
